arXiv (All)
open access
The Difference Between "Replicable" and "Not Replicable" Is Not Itself Scientifically Replicable
Replication studies estimate the replicability rate of scientific results by aggregating binary verdicts of experiments as ``replicated'' and ``not replicated''. These estimates assume rarely attainable exact replications. Experiments often do not share a common data-generating process, leading to n
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Irreproducible research and a typology of replication efforts#311592
- A Meta-perspective on Reproducibility and Replication Rates#178317
- Replication without replicators#756153
- Epistemology of Replicability#75300
- How to analyze a replication study#146580
Record · ID 1155180
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive