arXiv (All)
open access
Reasoning as Pattern Matching: Shared Mechanisms in Human and LLM Everyday Reasoning
When large language models (LLMs) fail to generalize or make content-sensitive errors in reasoning, it is often taken as evidence that LLMs are not truly reasoning, but rather performing a kind of pattern matching. The implication is that human behavior does not exhibit the same types of failures be
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Humans Disengage, Reasoning Models Persist: Separating Difficulty Registration from Deliberation Allocation#1083122
- Reasoning Shift: How Context Silently Shortens LLM Reasoning#1141509
- Reasoning or a Semblance of it? A Diagnostic Study of Transitive Reasoning in LLMs#987392
- DERELAB: Probing Defeasible Reasoning and Confirmation Bias in LLMs with a Generative Benchmark#799617
- Probability is Not Enough: Exploring and Counting Divergent Tokens for Reasoning Uncertainty Quantification in LLMs#1142368
Record · ID 1155231
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive