arXiv (All)
open access
Source Identification Is Not Fitness Testing: Measuring the Limits of Synthetic-Data Attribution
Repeated training on model-generated data can degrade later models. One possible response is to use provenance when deciding which generated examples to reuse. We test both how reliably that provenance can be recovered and whether it helps identify better training data. Using financial-risk text, we
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Generation Provenance Before Behavior Attribution: Auditing Synthetic Speech Research Objects#1156650
- SynthSentry: Detecting Synthetic Data Contamination in Language Model Training Data#1000309
- Distilling Diffusion Score Discrepancy for Efficient Training Data Attribution#1143377
- TrueMuse: A Benchmark for Data Attribution in Text-to-Music Models#1155770
- Auditing Information Disclosure During Large-Scale Gradient-Based Training via Gradient Uniqueness#1117259
Record · ID 1155352
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive