arXiv (All)
open access
Do Defenses Against LLM Extraction Work Across Attacks? A Lifecycle Benchmark of Black-Box Model Extraction
Large language models (LLMs) deployed through text-only APIs face model extraction risks, as adversaries can collect their responses to train surrogates that reproduce their capabilities. While prior work has developed diverse attacks and defenses, evaluations remain fragmented across access assumpt
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Do Defenses Against LLM Extraction Work Across Attacks? A Lifecycle Benchmark of Black-Box Model Extraction#1160959
- Why Are LLM Backdoor Defenses Fragmented? A Feature-Level Explanation with Sparse Autoencoders#799607
- Contextual Contamination: A Descriptive Case Study of Drift in a Goal-Aware LLM Dialogue Amplified by Gender-Bias#204181
- What Makes Adversarial Examples Transfer Across Deepfake Detectors?#996800
- Layered LLM Defenses as an Ensemble: Access Tiers, Inference Cost, and the Measured Failure Correlation Between Defense Layers#618508
Record · ID 1155774
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive