arXiv (All)
open access
The Price of Correlated Tests: How Strict Should a Model Release Gate Be?
Before a machine learning model ships, it often has to pass a suite of automated tests. Requiring every test to pass looks safe, yet it can reject many models that would have served users well, and it does not say how trustworthy a passing model actually is. We treat the release gate as a design pro
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Security Properties of Neural Networks as Decision Problems#1144935
- Security Properties of Neural Networks as Decision Problems#1136760
- Traditional progressive tests with stopping rules from Computerized Adaptive Testing: Do potential advantages outweigh added complexity?#327793
- Trusted Weights, Treacherous Optimizations? Optimization-Triggered Backdoor Attacks on LLMs#1144806
- Machine Learning Security Against Data Poisoning: Are We There Yet?#453810
Record · ID 1155928
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive