arXiv (All)
open access
ROGUE: Evaluating Corrigibility Failures in Frontier Computer-Use Agents
As AI agents are increasingly deployed in real personal and corporate settings (email accounts, development workflows, company databases, etc.), safety considerations surrounding these agents become paramount. Although much work has focused on agent safety in the presence of an adversary, we study c
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Computer Security [Guest editors' introduction]#199454
- AI Snitches Get Glitches: Towards Evading Agentic Surveillance#307060
- CSC: Turning the Adversary's Poison against Itself#128217
- Cybersecurity and Safety Co-Engineering of Cyberphysical Systems—A Comprehensive Survey#671756
- Reliability Theory for AI Control#1062313
Record · ID 1156375
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive