arXiv (All)
open access
Correct Looks Better: Pairwise Comparisons Reveal Accuracy Rankings
Pairwise comparisons combined with aggregation methods like Elo have become central to evaluating generative models, yet concerns remain that they reward superficial stylistic cues or display judge biases. In a more positive turn, we show that model rankings from pairwise comparisons strongly agree
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- The Flaw of Averages: Measuring Benchmark-Level Distributional Robustness#972966
- An Inspectable LLM Council for Multi-Model Research Answer Aggregation#1116243
- CARE: Confounder-Aware Aggregation for Reliable LLM Evaluation#986205
- LLM-Blender: Ensembling Large Language Models with Pairwise Ranking and Generative Fusion#16623
- Understanding And Enhancing Diversity In Generative Models#354230
Record · ID 1156383
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive