arXiv (All)
open access
Dependency-Aware Reward Shaping for Agentic Reinforcement Learning
When training large language models with reinforcement learning, terminal rewards provide little guidance about which steps matter. Common methods for assigning step credit overlook that work built on uncorrected mistakes is wasted while independent work remains valid. With only a final success/fail
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Beyond Verbalized Confidence: Calibrating Reasoners with Differentiable Readouts#1129470
- Cliff: Learning Process Rewards from the First Mistake#924942
- Cliff: Learning Process Rewards from the First Mistake#920708
- LSR-Ben: A Logical and Scientific Reasoning Benchmark for Evaluating Process Reward Models#1143744
- Small Language Models as Judges for Rubric-Based Reinforcement Learning#799249
Record · ID 1156479
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive