arXiv (All)
open access
Do MLLM Judges Judge the Edit? Auditing Bias in Image Editing Evaluation with Verified Quality Preservation
Multimodal large language models (MLLMs) are increasingly used as automated judges for instruction-based image editing and as reward signals for model training. However, systematically auditing whether these judges are influenced by cues irrelevant to editing quality is challenging because visual in
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- DocIntent: Answerability-Guided Agentic Restoration for Real-World Document Visual Question Answering#793261
- DocIntent: Answerability-Guided Agentic Restoration for Real-World Document Visual Question Answering#789257
- Semantically Aligned Gradient-Driven Context-Preserving Image Editing#1070172
- Same Evidence, Different Answer: Auditing Order Sensitivity in Multimodal Large Language Models#307002
- Vis-Poison: Poisoning Visual Knowledge in Multimodal Retrieval-Augmented Generation#785218
Record · ID 1156941
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive