arXiv (All)
open access
Detecting Inconsistencies in Model Specifications with LLM-as-Verifier Reasoning
Model specifications define how large language models (LLMs) should behave, guiding alignment training, inference-time behavior, and evaluation. Yet these specifications may themselves contain defects: two individually reasonable principles may prescribe incompatible behavior when applied to the sam
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Detecting Inconsistencies in Model Specifications with LLM-as-Verifier Reasoning#1169612
- Trace Grafting: Cross-Model Reasoning in Large Language Model Code Generation#1092500
- Trace Grafting: Cross-Model Reasoning in Large Language Model Code Generation#1092484
- CausalBN-Bench: A Comprehensive Benchmark for Causal Learning Capability of LLMs#974148
- RS as a Minimal Reasoning Architecture: How Structural Operators Enable Drift Free LLM Output Without Model Modification#693281
Record · ID 1157118
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive