arXiv (All)
open access
Transportability methods for failure-time outcomes under assumptions for relative effect measures
In certain clinical areas, relative effect measures are believed to remain more constant across populations than absolute measures. This suggests that exchangeability assumptions on the relative scale may be more plausible than those on the absolute scale. Despite this, most methods for extending tr
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Characterizing Survivor Principal Strata Over Time: Identification, Efficient Estimation, and Sensitivity Analysis#1142129
- Does your cost-effectiveness model answer the question of interest? Marginal versus conditional inputs and transportability across populations#1130332
- Association Between Hospital Tiers and Cardiogenic Shock Mortality: Mitigating the Transfer Penalty Through a Regionalized Hub-and-Spoke Model#161690
- Association Between Hospital Tiers and Cardiogenic Shock Mortality: Mitigating the Transfer Penalty Through a Regionalized Hub-and-Spoke Model#158279
- Test-Retest Reliability on the Revised Conner's Parent Rating Scale#212540
Record · ID 1157389
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive