eScholarship
metadata only
Do moral principles permit experimenting on nonconsenting beings?
This chapter discusses the harmful and fatal use of non-consenting beings, in this case largely nonhuman animals, in research. It argues and demonstrates that normal human moral principles prohibit such use of these individuals.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Re-framing the debate over animal morality#734067
- Animal morality: What is the debate about?#734054
- Moral Animals: Can Animals Be Moral? Rowlands Mark Oxford University Press New York, NY#740513
- Adventures in Moral Consistency: How to Develop an Abortion Ethic through an Animal Rights Framework#113960
- Two Perspectives on Animal Morality#100546
Record · ID 1157709
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive