CanLII
metadata only
Singh Maan v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration)
Decided: 2026-09-29. Docket: IMM-6747-25. Citation: 2026 FC 1206 (CanLII). Administrative law — Judicial review — Reasonableness — Application challenging decision of Refugee Appeal Division — Sole ground limited to assessment of evidence — Whether refusal to accept affidavits was unreasonable — Court finds no reviewable error in approach to admissibility — Application for judicial review dismissed | Citizenship and immigration — Refugee protection — Refugee Appeal Division — IRPA, subs. 110(4) new evidence requirements — Whether Applicant’s affidavit contains anything new — Affidavit found to be further details and argument — Test for new evidence applied with Singh v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2016 FCA 96 and Raza v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2007 FCA 385 — Applicat
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Ogunsanu v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration)#1146871
- Akintade v. Canada (Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness)#1066664
- Saif v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration)#928677
- Duarte Berganza v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration)#1066667
- Azubuike c. Copart Canada inc.#1146884
Record · ID 1158534
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive