Spiral
metadata only
Applying attribution explanations in truth-discovery quantitative bipolar argumentation frameworks
Explaining the strength of arguments under gradual semantics is receiving increasing attention. For example, various studies in the literature offer explanations by computing the attribution scores of arguments or edges in Quantitative Bipolar Argumentation Frameworks (QBAFs). These explanations, kn
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Argument-based approaches for enhancing automated fact-checking and generating explanations#124352
- A Fragility-Aware Argumentation Framework for Epistemic Risk Propagation: Formalization and a Case Study in Kalām Reasoning#694386
- Capturing the Hostile Attribution Bias through Conditional Reasoning Tasks: The Hostile Reasoning Test as an Indirect Measure of Aggressiveness#1108212
- Capturing the Hostile Attribution Bias through Conditional Reasoning Tasks: The Hostile Reasoning Test as an Indirect Measure of Aggressiveness#1108111
- Analysing Practical Argumentation#97101
Record · ID 1159889
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive