Springer Nature OA
open access
CC BY-NC-ND 4.0
The Foundations of AI Accountability in Policing—UK Accountability Arrangements as Example
The law regulates the actions of the police and the state generally, together with the use of data and technology by everyone. However, legislative frameworks only go so far and vary significantly across international borders, as do societal expectations. The AI accountability challenge for policing
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Approaches to AI Accountability and AI Compliance-by-Design for R&I Projects in Policing and Security: Lessons Learned from STARLIGHT#1159926
- The Digital Leviathan: AI, Surveillance, and the Erosion of Political Freedom#692329
- Accountability in Artificial Intelligence: What It Is and How It Works#726471
- AI in Predictive Policing : Examining Legal and Ethical Implications#328829
- AI Accountability Themes and Lifecycle: Practical Guidance#1159913
Record · ID 1159916
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive