Springer Nature OA
open access
CC BY-NC-ND 4.0
Practitioner Perceptions of What Is Needed for AI Accountability
Artificial intelligence presents policing with new accountability challenges that extend beyond established legal, organisational and professional standards. This chapter examines expert perceptions of what is needed to make AI accountability meaningful and demonstrable within policing and security
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Accountability in Artificial Intelligence: What It Is and How It Works#726471
- Establishing AI Accountability in Policing and Security#1159914
- Societal Expectations for AI Deployments in Policing#1159917
- Recognising the Benefits and Challenges of AI in Policing#1159919
- Organisational Best Practices for AI Accountability and Acceptance#1159924
Record · ID 1159927
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive