SocArXiv
metadata only
Using GitHub Actions for Computational Communication Research
Communication researchers increasingly use computational methods to collect and analyze large datasets. Part of the promise of these methods is their ability to increase the reproducibility and transparency of workflows. Taking up calls for more reproducible workflows and better recognition of the t
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- How Compliant Are GitHub Actions Workflows? A Checklist-Based Study with LLM-Assisted Auditing#155399
- Using LLMs in Software Design: An Empirical Study of GitHub and A Practitioner Survey#1036689
- From Threads to Trajectories: A Multi-LLM Pipeline for Community Knowledge Extraction from GitHub Issue Discussions#141550
- AI Agent Pull Requests on GitHub: Frequency, Structure, and Merge Conflict Rates#343545
- Beyond the YAML File: Understanding Real-World GitHub Actions Workflow Adoption#120591
Record · ID 1159936
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive