PhilArchive
open access
La visión pragmatista de C.S. Peirce sobre la aserción
C.S. Peirce defended a pragmatist view of assertion in terms of its normative effect. This paper has two goals. First, to reconstruct and assess Peirce’s argument for the thesis that to assert a proposition is to make oneself responsible for its truth. Second, to argue that Peirce interpreted “responsibility for truth” as the acquisition of a dialogical commitment, namely, the duty to defend the proposition asserted by giving reasons upon challenge.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Peirce on Assertion, Speech Acts, and Taking Responsibility#702696
- Peirce's Conception of Metaphysics#91497
- Misak's Peirce and Pragmatism's Metaphysical Commitments#740806
- Poinsot versus Peirce on Merging with Reality by Sharing a Quality#710334
- The Coimbra Jesuit Course as a Source of the Semiotic Logic of Charles S. Peirce#85200
Record · ID 115997
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive