ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
Comparison of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) Pathway With Conventional Pathway After Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy
The aim of this study is to compare two postoperative recovery pathways namely, enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) pathway and conventional recovery pathway after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy with respect to outcomes including hospital stay, postoperative pain and other postoperative outcomes.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Early Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) Versus Conventional Protocol After Laparoscopic Gastrectomy#904371
- Single Anastomosis Duodenal Ileal Bypass (SADI) for Sleeve Revision#812293
- SLEEVEDIAB To Explore the Early and Late Metabolic Effects of Sleeve Gastrectomy in Obese Patients#148695
- Istmin Levels in Laparoscopik Sleeve Gastrectomy#1033239
- Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy With and Without Omentectomy#910931
Record · ID 1161471
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive