ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
TeSE (Testicular Sperm Extraction) in Azoospermic Patients: m-TeSE vs. l-TeSE
The aim of the study is to compare surgical outcomes (intra and post-operative complications) and sperm retrieval rates between conventional microsurgical-assisted testicular sperm extraction (m-TeSE - Group A) and testicular sperm extraction performed with surgical loupes (l-TeSE - Group B) in adult males with non-obstructive azoospermia.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Microdissection Testicular Sperm Extraction (MicroTESE) and IVF-ICSI Outcome in Non-Obstructive Azoospermia (NOA)#857752
- Retrieval of Sperm From Men With Azoospermia Using Ultrasound-guided Rete Testis Aspiration#1030515
- Effect of Age on Sperm Recovery of Microdissection Testicular Sperm Extraction in Nonobstructive Azoospermia Patients#1138894
- Immediate spermatogenesis assessment after testicular tissue retrieval for azoospermic males using touch print smear.#244259
- The Safety of Thermocautery Usage for Male Children's Circumcisions#1124683
Record · ID 1161494
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive