ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
Comparing Ligation Methods During Canine Retraction Stage Using Conventional Brackets
The goal of this Randomized Controlled Trial (RCT) is to determine the most effective way to tie the main wire to the regular orthodontic brackets during the stage of orthodontic treatment where the canines are retracted. This study is for orthodontic patients aged 16 years and older who need to have their canines retracted into spaces where other teeth have been removed. The main questions it aims to answer are: 1. What is the effect of different ways of tying the wire to the braces on how much the maxillary canine moves back using conventional brackets? 2. How do various ways of tying the wire influence unwanted movements of the maxillary canines-specifically rotation, tipping, and extrusion? 3. What is the effect of these different tying methods on how much the back molar teeth shift forward (this is called "anchorage loss") while the maxillary canine is being pulled back? Researchers will compare three different ways of tying the wire to the braces to see if they differ in the amount of maxillary canine retraction, three-dimensional positional changes (rotation, tipping, and extrusion), and anchorage loss of maxillary first molars: * Group A: Uses an elastic power chain that wraps around all four parts (wings) of the brace. * Group B: Uses thin stainless-steel wires (ligatures) to tie the brace first, then an elastic power chain is placed over these wires, also wrapping around all four parts of the brace. * Group C: Uses small elastic rings on the two front parts (mesial wings) of the brace, and an elastic power chain on the two back parts (distal wings) of the brace. Participants will consist of orthodontic patients aged 16 years and above from the Postgraduate Orthodontic Clinic, Kulliyyah of Dentistry, IIUM, Kuantan, who require extraction of one or both maxillary first premolars, are planned for maximum anchorage using a Nance appliance, need at least 4mm of maxillary canine retraction, and have good oral hygiene. Participants will: * Undergo screenin
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Maximum Clinical Insertion Torque and Its Association With the Success Rate of Orthodontic Miniscrews#892330
- Gingival Cleft Development at Two Time Points of Canine Retraction#981163
- Maxillary canine retraction with self-ligating and conventional brackets#935369
- Miniscrews Primary Stability#889497
- The Effect of Surgical Interventions to Assist Orthodontic Movement of Impacted Maxillary Canines#966817
Record · ID 1161695
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive