ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
PUL vs TURP in BPH Patients With Urinary Retention
The study will be a prospective, randomized controlled trial comparing prostatic urethral lift (PUL) versus transurethral resection of prostate (TURP) in benign prostate hyperplasia (BPH) patients with urinary retention. The primary objective of this study is to compare the catheter-free rates of PUL vs TURP. Secondary objectives include comparison of complications rates, cost effectiveness, patient satisfactory, symptom scores, quality of life measures and urodynamic parameters.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- TURP Inpatient With Underactive Bladder With BOO#899464
- Urinary Retention After Removing Urinary Catheter at 24 Hour Versus 48 Hour in Patients With Vaginal Surgery#872167
- Development and validation of a predictive model for postoperative urinary retention following pelvic organ prolapse surgery: a retrospective study.#354577
- Effects of Pelvic Floor Muscle Training Combined With Bladder Training on Some Parametrs of Men With Urinary Frequency#846711
- Comparison Between Tamsulosin and Tadalafil in Management of Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia Long Term Study#879679
Record · ID 1161856
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive