ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
Laser Ablation Versus Conventional Fistulectomy for Uncomplicated Perianal Fistula
This randomized controlled trial aims to compare conventional open fistulectomy and laser ablation in the treatment of uncomplicated perianal fistula. The study will evaluate postoperative recovery time and recurrence rates between the two procedures. A total of 72 patients with uncomplicated perianal fistula will be randomly assigned to either conventional open fistulectomy or laser ablation and followed for six months after surgery.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Open Fistulectomy vs. Laser Closure for Low Perianal Fistula#981287
- Fistulodesis Pilot Study for Closure of Perianal Fistulae#1164892
- Prospective Multicentric Trial Between Radiofrequency Ablation With VNUS Closure Fast ® and Endovenous Ablation With 1470 nm Diode Laser and Tulip Fiber ® for Treatment of Primary Venous Insufficiency.#864235
- Randomized, Controlled Trial With Hybrid Fractional Laser#811562
- Outcomes and Patient Satisfaction After Colpocleisis for Pelvic Organ Prolapse#869826
Record · ID 1161936
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive