PhilArchive
open access
Why art is never representation - even when it represents
The question of whether or not art is essentially a representation of reality has long been a bone of contention among philosophers of art – especially in the major branch of that discipline called the analytic philosophy of art, or analytic aesthetics. This paper argues that art - visual art, literature or music - is never essentially representation. The argument is based on the thinking of André Malraux in "The Voices of Silence".
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Analytic Aesthetics and the Dilemma of Timelessness#116088
- Is Art the First Judgement? Reversing the Directionality of Aesthetic Structure#97460
- Apofatyka w fenomenologicznych rozważaniach o sztuce#716453
- Art's hidden topology: A window into human perception.#189921
- Music, Cage's Silence, and Art: An interview with Stephen Davies, PhD#98137
Record · ID 116211
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive