PhilArchive
open access
Bringing About Perfect Worlds
This chapter shows that, (i) necessarily, God is able to actualize a morally and naturally perfect world, but (ii) it is _impossible_ that, necessarily, God _does_ actualize a morally and naturally perfect world. This is called the Impossibility Argument. This chapter shows further that the Impossibility Argument is valid on any concept of free will: libertarianism, weak compatibilism, and strong compatibilism. The chapter concludes that theists have available to them a successful argument against the logical problem of evil that does not depend on any particular concept of free will. If God is permitted to actualize a morally and naturally perfect world, then God can coexist with evil. And the logical problem of evil is solved.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Impossibility and Impossible Worlds#716962
- Two Kinds of Logical Impossibility#765293
- Moral Animals: Ideals and Constraints in Moral Theory#750493
- Are Moral Prohibitions Modally Necessary?#110209
- Some Metaphysical Implications of a Credible Ethics of Belief#757380
Record · ID 116230
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive