Conceptio › Archive › ClinicalTrials.gov
ClinicalTrials.gov public full text Public Domain

Comparative Study of Antegrade Versus Retrograde Cerebral Perfusion in Acute Type A Aortic Dissection: A Prospective Study

Yusuf Shieba · 2020
ClinicalTrials.gov · Datasets · License: Public Domain · 2020
Open Source ↗
na
This prospective study investigated the comparison of effectiveness of antegrade cerebral perfusion (ACP) and retrograde cerebral perfusion (RCP) in providing cerebral protection during the surgical treatment of acute Type A aortic dissection (TAAD). Acute type A aortic dissection presents an aortic tear at its ascending portion, posing considerable risk with high morbidity and mortality incidence, especially from neurological insults. In total, 116 patients with acute type A aortic dissection were randomly assigned to undergo surgical intervention with either ACP through axillary artery cannulation or RCP through superior vena cava cannula placed during deep hypothermic circulatory arrest. Primary objectives focused on measuring and comparing the postoperative neurological complication rates associated with transient neurological deficits (TND) and permanent neurological deficits (PND). Secondary outcomes of interest included the duration of mechanical ventilation, length of stay in the ICU and hospital, and mortality.
Conceptio Open Archive

Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio

Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.

This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗

Related documents

Record · ID 1163021
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive