ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
Assets for Independence Evaluation
The U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Administration for Children and Families (ACF) is conducting an experimental evaluation of the Assets for Independence (AFI) Program. This evaluation-the first experimental evaluation of Individual Development Account (IDA) projects operating under the Assets for Independence Act-will contribute importantly to understanding the effects of IDA projects and IDA project features on participants. IDA programs provide matching funds to participants when the savings are withdrawn to spend on qualified asset purchases, most commonly homeownership, business-related expenses, or education. This study will build on the prior quasi-experimental AFI evaluation, as well as studies of other non-AFI funded Individual Development Account (IDA) projects. While some evaluations suggest that IDAs help low-income families save, rigorous experimental research is limited. No experimental evaluation of AFI-funded programs has been conducted to date. Of the quasi- or non-experimental studies, few have focused on AFI-funded IDAs. The evaluation is being conducted in two sites, with the random assignment of 299 AFI-eligible cases in one site and 509 cases in the other, for a total of 808 cases. Each site randomly assigned sample members to one of two groups: a control group and a treatment group receiving conventional AFI services. The primary research questions the study seeks to answer are: 1. What are the impacts of AFI program participation on the outcomes it is designed to address (e.g., savings and asset purchases)? 2. What are the impacts of AFI program participation on other outcome domains that the program might influence (e.g., material hardship, alternative financial product use, economic well-being)? 3. How do the impacts of AFI program participation vary over time and by participant characteristics? The study uses a two-armed (treatment vs. control) experimental design. This design allows the first two questions above to be a
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Family Supports and Beliefs Survey#1112435
- CSR disclosure in family-controlled and politically connected firms: Do audit committees matter?#233523
- Detecting Fraud in Development Aid#21504
- Security provision for the Patrick Finucane Inquiry, — GOVERNMENT COMMERCIAL AGENCY — Eventsec#656329
- 7 U.S.C. § 2234 — Purchases for bureaus from appropriations for contingent expenses#561061
Record · ID 1163247
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive