ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
Tilt and Tumble vs Divide and Conquer - a Unique Comparison of the Two Cataract Surgery Methods
The purpose of this study is to compare two different methods used during cataract surgery to remove the lens in the eye.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Tilt Prediction of Clareon Intraocular Lens#1102400
- Efficiency of Intraoperative Optical Coherence Tomography (iOCT)#891525
- Objective Evaluation of the Effect of Oculoplastic Operations Using the Vectra M 3D Imaging System#1031022
- OPEN-LABEL, MULTI-CENTER, PHASE 1b/2a CLINICAL TRIAL DESIGNED TO EVALUATE THE SAFETY AND EFFICACY OF IONTOPHORETIC DEXAMETHASONE PHOSPHATE OPHTHALMIC SOLUTION IN PATIENTS HAVING UNDERGONE CATARACT SURGERY WITH IMPLANTATION OF A POSTERIOR CHAMBER INTRAOCULAR LENS (IOL)#832475
- Predicting Lens Tilt Using Optical Coherence Tomography and Partial Least Squares Regression Modelling#882209
Record · ID 1163310
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive