ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
Different Approaches of Spinal Anesthesia in Patients Undergoing Cesarean Section
The goal of this clinical trial is to compare different approaches of spinal anesthesia in pregnant females who are having cesarean section. The main aim is • Which approach is better in terms of avoiding intraoperative and post operative complications Participants will be given anesthesia by 1. Midline approach 2. paramedian approach 3. Taylors approach
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Effect of Position During Spinal Anesthesia on Hemodynamic Change in Cesarean Section#803942
- Prevention of Post-spinal Anesthesia Hypotension in Caesarean Delivery Using Delayed Supine Positioning#152547
- Transversus Abdominis Plane Block Versus Rectus Sheath Block After Cesarean Delivery#1162228
- Postoperative Pain Relief After Cesarean Section: Is There a Role for the Quadratus Lumborum Block?#917422
- Comparison of the Effects of TFPB and Anterior QLB on Postoperative Analgesia in Cesarean Section Surgery#859180
Record · ID 1163666
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive