ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
Everolimus-Eluting Stent for Bifurcation Coronary Lesions: Comparison of Simple Versus Complex Techniques
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the treatment of true bifurcation lesions with the XIENCE V stent using the simple strategy (stent in main vessel and provisional T-stenting in the side branch) compared to the complex strategy (stent in main vessel and T-stenting in the side branch).
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Xience/Promus for Long Coronary Lesion Registry#1086090
- Optimal Strategy for Side Branch Stenting in Coronary Bifurcation Lesion#1075094
- Drug Coated Balloon for Side Branch Treatment vs. Conventional Approach in True Bifurcation Coronary Disease: PRO-DAVID#1075290
- BS-CERAB TECHNIQUE#1115027
- Two-stent vs Provisional Stenting Techniques for Patients With Complex Coronary Bifurcation Lesions#1033511
Record · ID 1163686
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive