ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
Quality of Recovery After Hip Fracture Surgery: US-guided PENG Block Versus FICB
Patients were randomly divided into two groups to receive either ultrasound-guided pericapsular nerve group block (PENG group) or fascia iliaca compartment block (FICB group), using 20 ml of 0.2% ropivacaine
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- PENG Block With Two Diffirent Volume#826452
- PENG Block vs FNB + ONB in Patients Undergoing Hip Fracture Surgery With Contraindications to Neuraxial Anesthesia#870444
- Ultrasound Percapsular Nerve Group Block VS Fascia Iliaca Block for Hip Fracture#1045676
- Comparison of Analgesic Efficacy of PENB Block with FICB in Post Operative Hip Fracture Patients#853457
- PENG Block vs. Intraoperative Local Anesthetic Infiltration for Total Hip Arthroplasty#889301
Record · ID 1164236
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive