ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
Different Treatment Methods Effect on Upper Extremity Spasticity and Decreased Functionality After Stroke
The aim of our study is to objectively and clearly determine the differences between the Spasticity and Decreased Functionality in the Upper Extremity Flexor Group Muscles After Stroke, the Vibration, mBZHT and Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation Applications in terms of treatment process and effectiveness, and to increase the use of the hands and upper extremities in the daily life activities of the patient.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Effects of m CIMT and Bilateral Arm Training on Upper Extremity Chronic Stroke Patients#904674
- Active Somatosensory Exercise for Chronic Stroke#899362
- Constraint-Induced Movement Therapy Plus Sensory Components After Stroke#992658
- Does the Enhanced Rehabilitation Programs Facilitate the Motor Recovery After Stroke?#1163338
- BTX-A and Mirror Therapy for Chronic Stroke Spasticity#873724
Record · ID 1164595
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive