ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
Cryoablation Versus Radiofrequency Ablation
The purpose of this retrospective study is to describe why and when we used cryo and why we crossed over when we used both RFA and cryo. It is also to determine if there is some predictor that would make us say one patient would be better served with one technique than another and to describe our overall acute success rate and then our 6-month recurrence rate with cryo ablation and compare it to our known success rate with RFA.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Percutaneous Cryoablation for the Treatment of Breast Cancer#1045572
- COOL-IT-PRO: Cryoablation of Breast Cancer in Non-surgical Patients#835924
- Efficacy and Safety of Cryoablation with Robotic Bronchoscopy System in Patients with Lung Cancer#898190
- Cryoablation for Invasive Breast Carcinoma Following Neoadjuvant Therapy#1074644
- Cryoanalgesia Study#1152000
Record · ID 1164790
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive