ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
Trial to Compare eConsent With Standard Consent Among Prospective Biobank Participants
The goal of this trial is to determine whether the Sage eConsent framework (presented using an electronic application) is non-inferior to traditional, paper-based, human-mediated consent-and therefore could be part of an acceptable population screening approach to identifying patients and others with actionable hereditary syndromes-and to increase basic knowledge about patients' informational needs about different aspects of genetic/omic screening. After receiving either 1) the traditional consenting approach, or 2) a consenting approach presented on an electronic tablet, the investigators will test for differences between these two arms in a variety of outcome measures including objective and perceived comprehension, time spent and informational needs, and enrollment decision, among others.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Digital-Supported Versus Standard Consent for Advanced Therapeutic Endoscopy#1072530
- Comprehension of Research Informed Consent When Applied Through a Telemedicine Medium#1095624
- UC Comments in Response to FDA's Proposed Guidance for Sponsors, Investigators,and Institutional Review Boards on Key Information and Facilitating Understanding in Informed Consent (Docket Number: FDA-2022-D-2997)#629288
- Facilitators and Barriers to Cancer Screening: Stakeholder Perspectives on Implementation#1102290
- Connors Protocol for the Management and Use of Stored Human Specimens (Stored Human Specimens)#1008955
Record · ID 1164849
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive