ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
Enteral Versus Intravenous Sedation in Critically Ill High-risk ICU Patients
Recent studies suggest the employment of 'conscious' sedation (1) for critically high - risk patients (2), showing more efficacy then deep sedation (3). The investigators want to compare intravenous injection versus enteral sedative drugs administration, purposing to maintain a 'conscious' sedation level compatibly with the needed cares, invasive procedures, and medical and nursing surveillance.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Advantages and Disadvantages of Long Term Sedation in Intensive Care Unit Patients#1102222
- A Comparison Between Propofol-Remifentanil and Midazolam-Remifentanil Sedation in the Intensive Care Unit#827623
- Effect of Remimazolam Sedation on Outcomes of Mechanically Ventilated Patients in the ICU#845255
- Comparison of Extubation Delay After Prolonged Sedation#867168
- EICU Analgesia and Sedation Cross-sectional Survey#1008197
Record · ID 1164870
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive