PhilArchive
open access
James M. Buchanan, John Rawls, and Democratic Governance
This article compares James M. Buchanan's and John Rawls's theories of democratic governance. In particular it compares their positions on the characteristics of a legitimate social contract. Where Buchanan argues that additional police force can be used to quell political demonstrations, Rawls argues for a social contract that meets the difference principle.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Deweyan Democracy, Robert Talisse, and the Fact of Reasonable Pluralism: A Rawlsian Response#734432
- In Praise of Friction: Mutual Interference, Parity, and the Benefits of Competition#74961
- Old Lessons for New Governance: Safety or Profit and the New Conventional Wisdom#494228
- The survival of egalitarian justice in John Rawls's political liberalism#727800
- Acts of moral courage among civil servants under democratic backsliding: A comparison of the Trump and Bolsonaro administrations#348898
Record · ID 116516
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive