CanLII
metadata only
Prudent Financial Services Inc. v. Saggu
Decided: 2026-10-01. Docket: M57558; COA-26-CV-1115. Citation: 2026 ONCA 706 (CanLII). Procedure — Stay pending appeal — Rules of Civil Procedure, r. 63.02(1) — RJR-MacDonald Inc. v. Canada (Attorney General) — Whether the moving party satisfied serious issue, irreparable harm, and balance of convenience — Interconnected factors and interests of justice considered — Enforcement of leave to issue writ of possession sought to be stayed — Stay denied | Procedure — Appeal — Scope of appealable order — Whether there was a serious issue to be tried where the order merely granted leave to issue a writ of possession — Unappealed prior possession judgment noted — Appeal characterized as lacking merit — No basis for continued possession identified — Stay denied | Family — Matrimonial home — Family L
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Ali v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration)#1001762
- Armota v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration)#1001763
- VPRS 8347 Appeal Files [Sample Only Retained] [DESTROYED]#204892
- 20 U.S.C. § 3609 — Retained rights#575734
- 28 U.S.C. § 2041 — Deposit of moneys in pending or adjudicated cases#556825
Record · ID 1166766
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive