CanLII
metadata only
Caruso v. Law Society of Ontario
Decided: 2026-09-28. Docket: COA-24-CV-0999. Citation: 2026 ONCA 677 (CanLII). Professional responsibility — Law Society regulation — Paralegal scope of practice — By-Law 4, s. 6(2) authorization tied to “a proceeding” — Whether By-Law 4 permits immigration legal services beyond IRB matters — Distinction between advocacy work and solicitors’ work — LSO FAQ policy interpretation upheld — Appeal dismissed | Statutory interpretation — Interpretation of subordinate legislation — Meaning of “proceeding” — By-Law 4 definition of “proceeding” and “intended proceeding” — Whether IRCC and CBSA applications are “a proceeding” — Ordinary meaning and context tied to adjudicative hearings — “Tribunal” not ordinary term for civil servants — Appeal dismissed | Constitution — Division of powers — Paramoun
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- A Critical Legal Studies Perspective#270041
- Berenguer v. SATA Internacional - Azores Airlines, S.A#1039733
- Perspective, critique, and pluralism in legal theory#1177959
- Newton v. Grillo#1053797
- Ramirez Pineda v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration)#1166761
Record · ID 1166774
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive