NCBI PubMed Central
open access
Reproducible study identification and selection in systematic reviews: barriers and paths forward.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- PRISMA-LLM: An Empirical Reporting Framework for AI-Assisted Systematic Reviews#673570
- Insights into systematic reviews and meta-analyses: Are we judgmental enough?#371404
- Conflicts of interest and industry funding declared in systematic reviews of interventions for six common diagnoses.#9476
- Effect of Emphasizing Methodological Limitations of Primary Studies in a Systematic Review Summary: Findings from Two Randomized Controlled Trials#276853
- A Benchmark Framework for Screening Automation in Systematic Reviews#1104497
Record · ID 1166995
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive