PsyArXiv
metadata only
The validation of cognitive ability constructs: A theoretically motivated user’s guide
How do we validate tests of cognitive abilities? We argue that the validation process depends fundamentally on the nature of the construct under investigation. There are two the different traditions in the study of validity: one emphasizes a realist approach, asserting that variations in an underlyi
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- The validation of cognitive ability constructs: A theoretically motivated user’s guide#1168999
- The cognitive bases of human tool use#774493
- Computerized Cognitive Training in Neurodegenerative Diseases (NDD2019)#845242
- Paper- vs. computer-based assessment in high-stakes testing: a common-person investigation of mode comparability.#1068959
- Fallible Heuristics and Evaluation of Research Traditions. The Case of Embodied Cognition#732903
Record · ID 1167811
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive