PhilArchive
open access
Transparency in internet regulation and governance: Arguments and counter-arguments with some methodological reflections
The debate on the argumentative turn in Public Policy and Administration (PPA), as reflective of the influence of politico-legal theory on the discipline, is reviewed with a thorough and indepth engagement with the Argumentation Theory (AT) literature. The focus in this article is in fact of a methodological nature since we argue that critical scholars - who have contributed to the general and specialized (i.e. political discourse analysis and critical contextualism) literature of AT as well as politico-legal theory - pave the way to a novel methodology which will be exemplified through the analysis of the transparency concept.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Semantics of ruling: reflective theories of regulation, governance and law#10665
- New Frontiers in the Philosophy of Intellectual Property#748222
- Comparison Of Protection Laws Private Data In Indonesia, And The Philippines#1177166
- A theory of evidence for evidence-based policy#707968
- An introduction to the study of public policy#422170
Record · ID 116818
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive