PhilArchive
open access
Conhecimento e Opinião em Aristóteles (Segundos Analíticos I-33)
This chapter discusses the first part of Aristotle's Posterior Analytics A-33, 88b30-89a10. I claim that Aristotle is not concerned with an epistemological distinction between knowledge and belief in general. He is rather making a contrast between scientific knowledge (which is equivalent to explanation by the primarily appropriate cause) and some explanatory beliefs that falls short of capturing the primarily appropriate cause.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Episteme, demonstration, and explanation: A fresh look at Aristotle’s Posterior Analytics#87935
- The Necessary and Necessarily Limited Role of Perception in Aristotle’s Account of Human Knowing#708294
- Aristotle's Prior Analytics and Boole's Laws of thought#711992
- Some remarks against non-epistemic accounts of immediate premises in Aristotle’s Posterior Analytics#102552
- Knowing in Aristotle part 1: Epistēmē, Nous, and non‐rational cognitive states#711451
Record · ID 116893
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive