ScholarlyCommons
metadata only
Justifications in Negotiations: How Rationales Influence Outcomes
Negotiators routinely justify their offers with rationales which are verifiable reasons, data, or criteria used to support a position (Ames & Lee, 2017). Existing research paints a mixed picture of when and why these justifications matter, with some studies showing they shape outcomes and others sug
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Justifications in Negotiations: How Rationales Influence Outcomes#1168932
- Theorizing justification#77041
- Can Hybrid Voluntarism Solve the Indeterminacy Problem of the Reasons Responsiveness Account of Rationality?#702273
- Rationality and Success#737630
- Rationality as Reasons-Responsiveness#744755
Record · ID 1168936
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive