ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
Liposomal Bupivacaine vs. Bupivacaine Hydrochloride and Lidocaine During Suburethral Sling Placement
Postoperative pain, the quality of their recovery and the opioid consumption following a midurethral sling placement are being compared between 2 groups. One group will have the hydro-dissection performed with a diluted liposomal bupivacaine solution. The other group will have the hydro-dissection performed with a diluted bupivacaine HCL and Lidocaine solution.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Pilot Study of Liposomal Bupivacaine Redosing in Patients Undergoing Major Gynecologic Procedures#867385
- Topical Lidocaine for Needle Insertion and Injection Pain#902121
- A Study of Bupivacaine Liposome Injection in Local Analgesia of Pediatric Patients#829408
- Efficacy of Liposomal Bupivacaine Versus 0.25% Bupivacaine for Laparoscopic Urologic Surgery#873172
- The Effect of Liposomal Lidocaine on Perceived Pain in Children During Percutaneous Interosseous Pin Removal in the Outpatient Setting#906344
Record · ID 1171066
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive