ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
Comparing the PiCCO Monitor to the Non-invasive Biobeat (BB)-316PW in ICU Patients
The aim of this study is to compare hemodynamic monitoring using the invasive PiCCO device to the BB-613PW wireless, non-invasive PPG-based device, in critically ill patients within the ICU, suffering from hemodynamic instability and in need of vasopressor support. Data will be gathered prospectively and analysed retrospectively.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- A Safety and Effectiveness Study of the Supira System in Patients Undergoing HRPCI - CE Study#1171916
- Effect of Acupressure on Blood Pressure, Heart Rate and Pain Severity#1111947
- A Study of Invasive Hemodynamic for MACHD Registry#1111381
- Use of PiCCO System in Critically Ill Patients With Septic Shock and Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome#856801
- Evaluation of Safety and Effectiveness of the EMBLOK EPS Compared With No Cerebral Embolic Protection During TAVR#905906
Record · ID 1171520
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive