ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
Mechanical Versus Manual Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation
In this study, the investigators compared mechanical and manual chest compressions in in-hospital cardiac arrest cases.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Mechanical Versus Manual Chest Compression#896125
- Exploring and improving resuscitation decisions in out of hospital cardiac arrest: synopsis of the PROTECTeD mixed-method study#452408
- Refractory Out-Of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest Treated With Mechanical CPR, Hypothermia, ECMO and Early Reperfusion#1095771
- Experiences and perceptions of lay bystanders responding to out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: A qualitative systematic review.#670906
- Positive end-expiratory pressure versus sham valve/zero end-expiratory pressure in cardiopulmonary resuscitation during manual ventilation to improve neurological outcomes in adult patients suffering an out-of-hospital cardiac arrest - an investigator-initiated, pragmatic, registry-based, multicenter, parallel-group, triple-blind randomized controlled superiority clinical trial in the ARREST registry (REVIVE-PEEP protocol Stage-1 Registered Report)#1161122
Record · ID 1172512
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive