ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
Clinician JUdgment Versus Risk Score to Predict Stroke outComes: The JURASSIC Clinical Trial
Background: Several risk score models are now available to assist clinicians estimate outcomes after an acute ischemic stroke. Limited information is available on the predictive value of these scores compared to real outcomes and clinical judgment. Objectives: To compare clinician judgment with the use of a validated stroke risk score (iScore) and patients' outcomes.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Predicting Risk of Atrial Fibrillation and Association With Other Diseases#910272
- Predictors and Prognostic Factors on the Acute Ischemic Stroke#851075
- VAN Assessment Tool in the Treatment of Acute Ischemic Stroke#1075595
- Global Trends in the Burden of Ischemic Stroke Attributable to Diabetes Versus Atrial Fibrillation#676447
- FOUR Score-Modified Trauma Scores for Mortality Prediction#836515
Record · ID 1172956
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive