Improving Knowledge To Efficaciously RAise Level of Contemporary Treatment in Heart Failure (

Heart failure (HF) remains to have a poor outcome. Even though recent advances in HF led to a reduction of morbidity and mortality, improvement in outcome is much less than expected based on large randomized trials. Various reasons may be responsible, such as complexity of disease and comorbidities, inadequate diagnosis and inappropriate treatment. So far, little attention has been paid on patients seen in primary care. Also, HF care mainly focuses on the individual patient-doctor relationship. However, the increasing complexity prevents individual physicians from covering all aspects of care. Consequently, multiple stakeholders are involved, including both general practitioners and specialists. Still, the relative role, the interaction between them and the processes included are hardly defined. These aspects may not only be relevant for patient care, but also for the setup of health care systems. Whereas multidisciplinary team should resemble a seamless system across primary and hospital care, there is a scarcity of research considering how these disease management programs perform, in what form they should be offered, and what care and support patients and caregivers would benefit most.The INTERACT-in HF (Improving kNowldege Transfer to Efficaciously RAise level of Contemporary Treatment in Heart Failure) study is set up to determine and assess relevant factors of the quality of HF care. The study evaluates processes of HF care, role of relevant care givers and interactions between them. It collects data from individual patients to assess characteristics and management of contemporary HF patients. This is performed in different countries (the Netherlands, Belgium and Germany) to analyze decision making with respect to diagnostics and treatment.Cross-sectional mixed-methods are used. Patients and their caregivers are interviewed. The patient is the central starting point. Then, the treating GP, cardiologist and HF nurse are interviewed. In parallel, retrospective d