ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
AGC Mode vs Minimal Flow in Breast Surgery
The aim of this study was to compare the AGC mode and manually controlled minimal-flow anesthesia for volatile anesthetic consumption, hemodynamic parameters, and recovery from anesthesia
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Comparison of Sevoflurane and Isoflurane Anesthesia for Benign Breast Tumor Excision#839003
- Low Flow Anesthesia Without Initial High Flow Phase#871875
- Comparing Local Anesthesia With General Anesthesia for Breast Cancer Surgery#912359
- A Study to Assess Indices of SNAP vs VISTA on Surgical Patients Undergoing General Anesthesia#884030
- Effect of Local Anesthesia Versus Induced Hypotensive Anesthesia on Quality of External Dacryocystorhinostomy Operation#1163437
Record · ID 1173155
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive