ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
Plenum® Osshp in Maxillary Sinus Elevation Surgery
The aim of this study is to qualitatively and quantitatively evaluate bone neoformation in maxillary sinus lift surgery filled with Plenum® Oss hp, compared to filling with autogenous bone, and to verify the association of Plenum® Osshp with i-PRF (i-PR - injectable platelet-rich fibrin). For this, forty (40) participants will be recruited, divided into 4 groups, which will have 10 participants each, namely: Group 1: Autogenous bone; Group 2: Plenum® Osshp; Group 3: Plenum® Osshp; + i-PRF and Group 4: Plenum® Osshp; + autogenous bone. To evaluate the primary outcome, volumetric analysis will be performed by obtaining computed tomography scans at 15 days (T1) and 6 months (T2) after graft surgery, with the aid of a volumetric tomography machine for dentofacial images. The values obtained at T2 will be subtracted from those obtained from T1 to obtain the volumetric stability value. After six months of repair, biopsies will be performed using a trephine drill, followed by the installation of implants and healers. Through microcomputed tomography analysis, the parameters of bone volume fraction (BV/TV), total porosity (Po.Tot), trabecular thickness (Tb.Th), number of trabeculae (Tb.N) and separation of trabeculae (Tb.Sp) will be evaluated. Histomorphometric analysis will be performed to obtain the areas of bone neoformation, connective tissue and remaining biomaterial that will be calculated for each area of the sample (cervical, intermediate, and apical) and later summed, obtaining the total representative area of the sample. Through immunohistochemical analysis, specific primary antibodies to Runx2, VEGF, Osteocalcin (OC) and Tartrate-Resistant Acid Phosphatase (TRAP) will be identified. The occurrence of adverse events will be collected through the analysis of pain, infection, and edema. The quantitative results of the histomorphometric, microtomographic, and volumetric stability analysis will be tabulated and submitted to the ANOVA test, and if they present a statis
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Comparison of Allograft, Xenograft and Combined Grafting in Maxillary Sinus Augmentation#916001
- Collagenic vs Collagen-enriched Graft in Sinus Elevation: RCT#856184
- Assessment of Digital and Clinical Workflow Using Patient Specific Sticky Bone /Implant Housing PEEK Shell in Anterior Atrophic Maxilla: A Case Series#970069
- Accuracy of Maxillary Repositioning During Orthognathic Surgery#1058097
- Evaluation of β-tricalcium Phosphate/Calcium Sulfate Versus Allografts#992191
Record · ID 1174204
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive